All right, first up is "A Murder in Hollywood" about the murder of Johnny Stompanato. There really was no "untold" in this book, it just rehashed what we already knew, but Sherman did go into detail regarding Turner's early life (her father was murdered during a burglary when she was a little girl, which I didn't know).
Lana Turner was a major star and a serial bride. She had already been married four times by the time she met Johnny, a shady guy with mob connections. Johnny was abusive and hit her, stalked her, refused to go away, showed up unannounced (and unwanted) on her sets. Just a garbage human being all the way around (although not quite as bad as hubby number four, Lex Barker, who sexually abused Lana's preteen daughter, Cheryl).
Johnny was stabbed to death in Lana's bedroom one night, and Cheryl took the blame. I think by now most people realize Lana probably killed him and Cheryl copped to it because she was only 14, but who knows for sure? It was a quick read but yeah, sorely lacking on anything new.
I wanted to like "Postmortem", I truly did. But unfortunately there were too many factual errors that kept me from enjoying it (and I hate using the word "enjoy" for these type of grisly true crime books, but I don't know what other word to use).
Right off the bat, O'Neil claimed that the McDonald's in Des Plaines, Illinois, was the first one. No, not actually. The first McDonald's was in San Bernadino, California. The one in Des Plaines was the first that Ray Kroc opened, after he bought the business from the McDonald brothers (there's a whole story behind that). So that was misleading. Later on in the book she referred to Lizzie Borden as an ax murderer. Now, Lizzie is one of my OG true crime obsessions, so there are very few books I haven't read about the crimes in Fall River, and I don't believe she was guilty. That's not only just my opinion, it was also the official verdict of the jury when she was tried for the crimes: Not Guilty. So while O'Neil might *believe* Lizzie is guilty (an opinion many people hold), I don't think it's right or fair to say that without qualifying that Lizzie was tried by a jury who determined she was not guilty.
Things like that really bother me, especially when the author is supposed to be a well-respected researcher. And where the heck was the editor? Why didn't they do anything?
Oh well. Her story was actually interesting: O'Neil's mother is Kim Byers, the young lady working at Nisson Pharmacy the night that Gacy took his last victim, Rob Piest. Kim and Rob were friends, and Kim ended up being an extremely important witness for the prosecution for a few reasons. One was that Gacy tried to claim he never talked to Rob, but Kim testified that Rob told her he was going to talk to Gacy about a potential summer job that paid twice what he was making at the pharmacy. Secondly, Kim put a photo receipt in the pocket of Rob's parka (which he let her borrow, since she was working at the front counter and got cold every time the doors opened. It was December after all). That receipt and Rob's parka were later found in Gacy's house, but the receipt let the police get their initial search warrant.
O'Neil's book wasn't trying to rehash the original crimes but rather discuss generational trauma and the trauma we as a nation have for events that enter the national psyche. That was interesting enough, if only she'd stuck to the facts in every part of the book instead of choosing what to be accurate about.
